Showing posts with label Bbahadurgarh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bbahadurgarh. Show all posts
Thursday, May 24, 2012
DISTANCE FROM BAHADURGARH
DISTANCE FROM BAHADURGARH
Sonepat 39.0 Kms
Rohad 13.5 Kms
Sampla 19.0 Kms
Rohtak 40.0 Kms
Jhajar 30.0 kms
Badli 20.0 Kms
Reliance SEZ 26.0 Kms
Gurgaon 25.0 Kms
Najafgarh 10.0 Kms
Indra Gandhi Airport 29.0 Kms
Nangloi 13.0 Kms
Peeragarhi Chowk 15.5 Kms
Punjabi Bagh Ring Road 20.0 Kms
Friday, April 20, 2012
Haryana decides penalty, orders completion of KMP by December 2012 -end
Haryana decides penalty, orders completion by December-end
MUKESH BHARDWAJ Posted: Apr 20, 2012 at 0326 hrs
Chandigarh Irked by the long delay in the construction of the much touted Kundli-Manesar-Palwal Expressway, which was scheduled for completion by July, 2009 after construction commenced in July, 2006, the Haryana government has now put its foot down and has asked the concessionaire to complete the work by the year-end.
It has also asked it to start the Manesar-Palwal section by April 15 as per the revised programme after a recent inspection conducted by Rajiv Arora, Managing Director of Haryana Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (HSIIDC) — the executing agency for the project.
Taking a serious view of the slow progress of the expressway, the government has decided to take action against the concessionaire by imposing penalties for the delay at the rate of 0.01 per cent of the total project cost per week or part thereof in accordance with the provisions under the agreement.
Monday, August 22, 2011
HOUSING SOCIETY ASKED TO PAY FOR THEFT IN MEMBER’S FLAT
HOUSING SOCIETY ASKED TO PAY FOR THEFT IN MEMBER’S FLAT
Press Trust of India Posted online: Mon Aug 22 2011, 02:57 hrs
Mumbai : A Consumer Forum has ordered a housing society to pay Rs 5,000 to a flat owner for failing to check antecedents of two watchmen who went missing after allegedly stealing articles worth Rs 2.5 lakh at his flat.
Asking Silver Arch Mutual Cooperative Housing Society, located in suburban Vile Parle, to pay Rs 5,000 as compensation to the aggrieved flat owner, the Mumbai Suburban Consumer Redressal Forum observed that the society did not enquire about the personal details of the watchmen and also did not bother to inform police about their antecedents.
The society had also failed to keep their photographs in their record which may have helped police in identifying them, the forum noted.
“The society was not vigilant and was found deficient in providing security to the members,” observed the president of forum G L Deshpande and member Deepa Bidnurkar, while asking the society to pay compensation of Rs 5,000 to its member, Keth Fernandes.
Press Trust of India Posted online: Mon Aug 22 2011, 02:57 hrs
Mumbai : A Consumer Forum has ordered a housing society to pay Rs 5,000 to a flat owner for failing to check antecedents of two watchmen who went missing after allegedly stealing articles worth Rs 2.5 lakh at his flat.
Asking Silver Arch Mutual Cooperative Housing Society, located in suburban Vile Parle, to pay Rs 5,000 as compensation to the aggrieved flat owner, the Mumbai Suburban Consumer Redressal Forum observed that the society did not enquire about the personal details of the watchmen and also did not bother to inform police about their antecedents.
The society had also failed to keep their photographs in their record which may have helped police in identifying them, the forum noted.
“The society was not vigilant and was found deficient in providing security to the members,” observed the president of forum G L Deshpande and member Deepa Bidnurkar, while asking the society to pay compensation of Rs 5,000 to its member, Keth Fernandes.
Thursday, August 18, 2011
The Confederation of Real Estate Developers’ Associations of India (CREDAI)
The Confederation of Real Estate Developers’ Associations of India (CREDAI)
S K Malik said...
CREDAI is the apex body for private real estate developers in India. CREDAI represents over 5,000 developers through 20 member associations across the country. It’s numerous initiatives and activities help developers come together and work towards better practices, improved customer service and a stronger realty industry.CODE OF CONDUCTINTRODUCTIONThis ‘Code of Conduct’ is recommendatory in nature. Member Associations, may modify the same in order to meet their local conditions, provided such changes are not out of harmony with the essence of these contents.OBJECTSThe aim of this code of conduct for Developers, Promoters and Builders is to maintain the honour and dignity of Developers, Promoters and Builders in general, to secure the spirit of friendly co-operation between the Developers, Promoters and Builders and their customers in the promotion of highest standard of promotion, development and building activities and to establish transparency, and fair dealing between the developers, promoters and builders with their customers; and to establish a spirit of brotherhood within the Associations of Developers, Promoters and Builders to try and ensure that Developers, Promoters and Builders discharge their responsibilities to the community in general.For the aforesaid objectives the member associations of CREDAI desire to adopt the following norms of conduct. (However, specific mention of the following norms of conduct / rules shall not be construed as conferring upon the members and / or the customers and / or the premise purchasers any legal right enabling them to enforce the same in Court of Law of otherwise).If any member is found to violate the code, action can be taken against him by the Member Association (even to the extent of his membership being discontinued) subject to a detailed enquiry by a select committee whose recommendations if endorsed by the Managing Committee and by the General Body of the respective member association, would lead to a written warning/reprimand or termination of membership of the member.Any such action proposed to be taken by the managing Committee shall be put in to effect 30 days after communicating the proposed decision to the member in writing by Registered Post Acknowledgement due at his address as per records of the Association. The member can appeal the decision of the Managing Committee to the General Body of the member association whose decision shall be final and binding. This appeal must be lodged within 30 days of the date of communication by the Managing Committee failing which the decision communicated shall be final and bindingThe member may appeal against this decision to the CREDAI (national) within 30 days of this communication from the member association. The CREDAI (national) will hear this matter within 30 days thereafter and communicate the final decision to the member association as also the individual member.Once the decision to discontinue the membership is finalized the association will have to inform in writing to all local statutory authorities of this action as also publish a notice in the local newspapers for information to public at large with regard to the discontinuation of the membership of that developer. Additionally all the CREDAI (national) and other member associations will be duly informed of the same and should the member be a member of any other CREDAI association then it is for them to decide on course of action for that membership in light of this termination of membership.
CODE OF CONDUCTWe, the member associations of CREDAI adopt the following code of conduct. Any addition / Deletion can be effected from time to time with the consent of the General Body. Proposals must be circulated 30 days prior to the General Body meeting.1. TITLEThere should be a true disclosure of the property under development in the “Title Certificate” from a solicitor / Advocate showing the rights and obligations of the developers along with the Agreement for sale.2. INSPECTION OF SANCTIONSAll sanction from the sanctioning authorities like approved plans and commencement certificates, N.A. permission, exemption order under U.L.C. Act (if required) etc., should be made available for perusal of the purchaser at the time of signing the agreement.3. BOOKING OF PREMISESThe Developer should normally commence booking / Sale of flats / premises only after obtaining sanction of plans and commencement certificate and clearances from the competent authorities. If booking is entered into with purchasers before obtaining all required clearances the purchaser must be made aware of this fact at the time of this booking and if necessary by way of a true disclosure in the agreement and or the title certificate.4. AGREEMENT OF SALE The Developer should enter in to a proper agreement as per the relevant Acts immediately on receipt of Earnest Money or any Deposit from the purchaser of flats / premises.5. PAYMENTSPayment receivable under the Agreement for sale should be scheduled according to the progress of the work and as per the provisions of the relevant Acts or as may be mutually agreed between the purchaser and developer.6. ESCALATIONThe developer should not enhance the price of the flats / premises once the agreement for sale is executed – on any account whatsoever; except for additional levies, taxes, court orders or in terms of the relevant Acts or under force majeure conditions. However, if there is a specific understanding between the Developer and Purchaser which is spelt out in the agreement, escalation can be charged on mutually agreed formulae or terms.7. CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGThe developer should construct the building only as per the rules / sanctioned plan and regulations of the Authority. Any variations should be within prescribed and permitted and prevailing norms / rules8. QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTIONThe Developers must ensure good quality materials and proper workmanship. Specifications as per agreement should be adhered to and statutory specifications of the Local Planning Authority should be complied with. Proper technical supervision on site should be ensured through qualified and experienced technical personnel in addition to usual qualified structural engineers and architects.
9. PLANS & SALEABLE AREAA. PLANS: -A member • Shall conform his building plans strictly to the prevailing regulations and byelaws.• Shall make available copies of sanction plan and other permissions available to the purchaser on request.• Shall display the sanctioned plan date & number in a prominent place at the construction site.B. SALEABLE/CARPET AREA: - The carpet areas of individual tenements is the area of the inner measurements of the tenement at floor level excluding the column offsets and wall finishes but will include the areas of balconies, cupboards, accessible internal projections including private terraces and the door/window jambs and will also include the following detached habitable area, if any, such as servants’ room etc. for exclusive ownership.• Mezzanine floor/lofts, if any.• An agreed %age of the double heights rooms or terraces, if any.• An agreed %age of the private/reserved carparks allotted or sold to the customer for exclusive use.• An agreed %age of the private/reserved garden or ground area allotted or sold to the customer for exclusive use.All agreed %ages referred to above shall be stated in the agreement of saleA member shall offer his units for sale based on either carpet area as above or “saleable/built up area”, which will be arrived at by adding to the carpet area: all wall, column thicknesses, proportionate share from the common areas such as entrance lobby, staircases, upper floor lobbies and landings, lift cores at every level, lift machine rooms, generator room, electrical room/substations/transformers, gas banks, garbage room, clubhouse, security room, club house, indoor sports room/s, security cabin, general toilets for servants / drivers and any such amenities/rooms or designated spaces provided these have not been charged separately plus any other common constructed areas not mentioned hereinabove. The member association may from time to time adopt standard procedure for ease of the purchasers in their city/town/state a certain percentage of area in lieu of Proportionate share from the common areas as above which then will be applicable to all the members and the purchasers as a standard practice.NOTE: • Ground space for garden or any other purpose and / or terrace space to be allotted for exclusive use if any shall be indicated transparently and charged for separately. • Plinth area shall be computed by measuring from wall to wall. While exclusive wall shall be fully accounted, shared walls shall be split.• All agreements for sale of any premises shall contain a floor plan showing the internal dimensions from which the carpet can be computed• Details showing how the saleable area is arrived at with specific details of the common area shall be disclosed with clarity duly certified be an architect as per above norms at the time of booking.Underground sump, water tanks, compound walls, septic tank, open to sky walk ways, , open to sky swimming pool, open sports facilities, chajjas, weather sheds, inaccessible flower beds, lofts, common open to sky terraces, stairwell ducts and voids etc. and the like.10. CONSTRUCTION, TIME FRAME, PENALTY, GENERAL CONDITIONS:
SK Malik
skmlk@yahoo.co.in
9818686240
S K Malik said...
CREDAI is the apex body for private real estate developers in India. CREDAI represents over 5,000 developers through 20 member associations across the country. It’s numerous initiatives and activities help developers come together and work towards better practices, improved customer service and a stronger realty industry.CODE OF CONDUCTINTRODUCTIONThis ‘Code of Conduct’ is recommendatory in nature. Member Associations, may modify the same in order to meet their local conditions, provided such changes are not out of harmony with the essence of these contents.OBJECTSThe aim of this code of conduct for Developers, Promoters and Builders is to maintain the honour and dignity of Developers, Promoters and Builders in general, to secure the spirit of friendly co-operation between the Developers, Promoters and Builders and their customers in the promotion of highest standard of promotion, development and building activities and to establish transparency, and fair dealing between the developers, promoters and builders with their customers; and to establish a spirit of brotherhood within the Associations of Developers, Promoters and Builders to try and ensure that Developers, Promoters and Builders discharge their responsibilities to the community in general.For the aforesaid objectives the member associations of CREDAI desire to adopt the following norms of conduct. (However, specific mention of the following norms of conduct / rules shall not be construed as conferring upon the members and / or the customers and / or the premise purchasers any legal right enabling them to enforce the same in Court of Law of otherwise).If any member is found to violate the code, action can be taken against him by the Member Association (even to the extent of his membership being discontinued) subject to a detailed enquiry by a select committee whose recommendations if endorsed by the Managing Committee and by the General Body of the respective member association, would lead to a written warning/reprimand or termination of membership of the member.Any such action proposed to be taken by the managing Committee shall be put in to effect 30 days after communicating the proposed decision to the member in writing by Registered Post Acknowledgement due at his address as per records of the Association. The member can appeal the decision of the Managing Committee to the General Body of the member association whose decision shall be final and binding. This appeal must be lodged within 30 days of the date of communication by the Managing Committee failing which the decision communicated shall be final and bindingThe member may appeal against this decision to the CREDAI (national) within 30 days of this communication from the member association. The CREDAI (national) will hear this matter within 30 days thereafter and communicate the final decision to the member association as also the individual member.Once the decision to discontinue the membership is finalized the association will have to inform in writing to all local statutory authorities of this action as also publish a notice in the local newspapers for information to public at large with regard to the discontinuation of the membership of that developer. Additionally all the CREDAI (national) and other member associations will be duly informed of the same and should the member be a member of any other CREDAI association then it is for them to decide on course of action for that membership in light of this termination of membership.
CODE OF CONDUCTWe, the member associations of CREDAI adopt the following code of conduct. Any addition / Deletion can be effected from time to time with the consent of the General Body. Proposals must be circulated 30 days prior to the General Body meeting.1. TITLEThere should be a true disclosure of the property under development in the “Title Certificate” from a solicitor / Advocate showing the rights and obligations of the developers along with the Agreement for sale.2. INSPECTION OF SANCTIONSAll sanction from the sanctioning authorities like approved plans and commencement certificates, N.A. permission, exemption order under U.L.C. Act (if required) etc., should be made available for perusal of the purchaser at the time of signing the agreement.3. BOOKING OF PREMISESThe Developer should normally commence booking / Sale of flats / premises only after obtaining sanction of plans and commencement certificate and clearances from the competent authorities. If booking is entered into with purchasers before obtaining all required clearances the purchaser must be made aware of this fact at the time of this booking and if necessary by way of a true disclosure in the agreement and or the title certificate.4. AGREEMENT OF SALE The Developer should enter in to a proper agreement as per the relevant Acts immediately on receipt of Earnest Money or any Deposit from the purchaser of flats / premises.5. PAYMENTSPayment receivable under the Agreement for sale should be scheduled according to the progress of the work and as per the provisions of the relevant Acts or as may be mutually agreed between the purchaser and developer.6. ESCALATIONThe developer should not enhance the price of the flats / premises once the agreement for sale is executed – on any account whatsoever; except for additional levies, taxes, court orders or in terms of the relevant Acts or under force majeure conditions. However, if there is a specific understanding between the Developer and Purchaser which is spelt out in the agreement, escalation can be charged on mutually agreed formulae or terms.7. CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGThe developer should construct the building only as per the rules / sanctioned plan and regulations of the Authority. Any variations should be within prescribed and permitted and prevailing norms / rules8. QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTIONThe Developers must ensure good quality materials and proper workmanship. Specifications as per agreement should be adhered to and statutory specifications of the Local Planning Authority should be complied with. Proper technical supervision on site should be ensured through qualified and experienced technical personnel in addition to usual qualified structural engineers and architects.
9. PLANS & SALEABLE AREAA. PLANS: -A member • Shall conform his building plans strictly to the prevailing regulations and byelaws.• Shall make available copies of sanction plan and other permissions available to the purchaser on request.• Shall display the sanctioned plan date & number in a prominent place at the construction site.B. SALEABLE/CARPET AREA: - The carpet areas of individual tenements is the area of the inner measurements of the tenement at floor level excluding the column offsets and wall finishes but will include the areas of balconies, cupboards, accessible internal projections including private terraces and the door/window jambs and will also include the following detached habitable area, if any, such as servants’ room etc. for exclusive ownership.• Mezzanine floor/lofts, if any.• An agreed %age of the double heights rooms or terraces, if any.• An agreed %age of the private/reserved carparks allotted or sold to the customer for exclusive use.• An agreed %age of the private/reserved garden or ground area allotted or sold to the customer for exclusive use.All agreed %ages referred to above shall be stated in the agreement of saleA member shall offer his units for sale based on either carpet area as above or “saleable/built up area”, which will be arrived at by adding to the carpet area: all wall, column thicknesses, proportionate share from the common areas such as entrance lobby, staircases, upper floor lobbies and landings, lift cores at every level, lift machine rooms, generator room, electrical room/substations/transformers, gas banks, garbage room, clubhouse, security room, club house, indoor sports room/s, security cabin, general toilets for servants / drivers and any such amenities/rooms or designated spaces provided these have not been charged separately plus any other common constructed areas not mentioned hereinabove. The member association may from time to time adopt standard procedure for ease of the purchasers in their city/town/state a certain percentage of area in lieu of Proportionate share from the common areas as above which then will be applicable to all the members and the purchasers as a standard practice.NOTE: • Ground space for garden or any other purpose and / or terrace space to be allotted for exclusive use if any shall be indicated transparently and charged for separately. • Plinth area shall be computed by measuring from wall to wall. While exclusive wall shall be fully accounted, shared walls shall be split.• All agreements for sale of any premises shall contain a floor plan showing the internal dimensions from which the carpet can be computed• Details showing how the saleable area is arrived at with specific details of the common area shall be disclosed with clarity duly certified be an architect as per above norms at the time of booking.Underground sump, water tanks, compound walls, septic tank, open to sky walk ways, , open to sky swimming pool, open sports facilities, chajjas, weather sheds, inaccessible flower beds, lofts, common open to sky terraces, stairwell ducts and voids etc. and the like.10. CONSTRUCTION, TIME FRAME, PENALTY, GENERAL CONDITIONS:
SK Malik
skmlk@yahoo.co.in
9818686240
Status of Six Laning of NH 10 (Delhi border to Rohtak)
Status of Six Laning of NH 10 (Delhi border to Rohtak)
Six laning of NH 10 Delhi/Haryana Border to Rohtak and four lane bypass for Bahadurgarh & Rohtak, NHDP Phase III Project, under Implementation
Status: 31st August 2010Length (Km) 63.49Date of Start May 2008Original Completion Date May 2010Estimate Completion Date May 2011Contractor & Nationality KCT - ERA consortium- IndianSupervision Consultant & Nationality ICT Pvt Ltd- Indian
NHAI have removed the page from Web Site (from Jan 2011) showing “Starting Date” and “Planned Completion Date” “Revised Completion Date” & Name of Consultant etc for running projects. This is BAD & not transparent.
Delhi/ Haryana Border to Rohtak, NH 10, (NHDP Phase III Projects under Implementation Status as on 30th June 2011) Revised Target Date Nov 2011 (By SK Malik, skmlk@yahoo.co.in)
Six laning of NH 10 Delhi/Haryana Border to Rohtak and four lane bypass for Bahadurgarh & Rohtak, NHDP Phase III Project, under Implementation
Status: 31st August 2010Length (Km) 63.49Date of Start May 2008Original Completion Date May 2010Estimate Completion Date May 2011Contractor & Nationality KCT - ERA consortium- IndianSupervision Consultant & Nationality ICT Pvt Ltd- Indian
NHAI have removed the page from Web Site (from Jan 2011) showing “Starting Date” and “Planned Completion Date” “Revised Completion Date” & Name of Consultant etc for running projects. This is BAD & not transparent.
Delhi/ Haryana Border to Rohtak, NH 10, (NHDP Phase III Projects under Implementation Status as on 30th June 2011) Revised Target Date Nov 2011 (By SK Malik, skmlk@yahoo.co.in)
KMP Expressway PROGRESS
KMP Expressway PROGRESS
Target Date, by July/ August 2009 (42 Months). The KMP would intersect NH-10, at a distance of merely 4 Kms from Bahadurgarh. This is expected to further shorten the distance to Gurgoan (19 Kms.) and Sonepat (25 Kms,) only. Bahadurgarh to Sonepat 19 Kms Bahadurgarh to Gurgaon 25 Kms
Target Completion date re-sheduled to Jan 2010 (Delay months) This is first extension. Performance/ poject management skill of NAHI, DS Construction and Haryan Ind Development Corp. will be tested
Both WPE (Kundli-Manesar-Palwal) and EPE (Sonepat-Baghpat-Ghaziabad), having a combined length of 269 km, are lagging badly. The deadline for WPE was July 27, 2009 but the monitoring committee on inspection found that only 12.2% of the work had been carried out by contractors till December 31, 2008 as against the target of 73.21%. EPE contract is not awarded yet due to single quote received.
PROJECT PROGRESS KMP EXPRESS Start Date Feb 2006 Target Date 29 07 09 Duration 42 Months Project Cost Rs.1, 800 Crores Revised Target Date Jan 2010 Actual Progress 12.20 % as on 31 12 08 (Planned Scheduled 73.21 %) Actual Progress 14.47 % as on 23 02 09 (Span Consultant Private appointed by HSIDC to monitor the project) Actual Progress 18.03 % as on 30 04 09 (As per Sh. AK Singla of HSIDC) Actual Progress 20.0 % as on May 09 (As per Sh. AK Singla of HSIDC) 1. This project is for National Capital of India 2. Our Supreme Court is monitoring the project progress 3. Project area with good connectivity/ communication network, availability of Infrastructure, raw material and man power 4. Executed by private player on Public Private Partnership basis 5. Toll Road early commissioned early earning per day 6. We have “Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation Government of India ” 7. State CM is monitoring the project We are failed in meeting the target. We shall analysis, Why we are NALAYAK in “Project Implementation and Management”. What will be the status of project implementation in remote / hilly/ rural/ backward/ inaccessible locations sponsored by poor and politically CHOR state governments?
Financial commissioner and principal secretary of industries, (Haryana)Mr Y S Malik said on Nov20, 2009. Malik claimed that the connectivity between NH-8 near Manesar and NH-2 near Palwal would get a push with the opening of the first stretch of the KMP expressway. "The concessionaire has told us that it would be opened for traffic in the next 3-4 months. However, we have extended the deadline of the entire stretch to December 2010,'' he said. The developer had earlier claimed to complete this stretch by this year end.
Feb 05, 2010 PROGRSS REPORT SUBMITTED TO SUPEREME COURT Western Expressway Physical Progress on Nov 30, 2009 32.20 % Vs Planned progress for July 29, 2009 - 100 %. New plan progress will be achieved on Dec 31, 2010 of 52.60 % Delhi’s environmental woes are here to stay with the ambitious Eastern Peripheral Expressway (EPE), planned as an alternate route for heavy commercial vehicles crossing the Capital, all set to miss its October 2010 deadline by four years. The environmental panel under Bhure Lal, monitoring the project work, informed the Forest Bench of the Supreme Court on Friday that while acquisition of land was still incomplete, the project has witnessed an escalation in cost from an estimated Rs 3,551 crore to Rs 4,700 crore, with the road showing no signs of completion before 2014.
The company constructing Kundli-Manesar-Palwal (KMP) Expressway (also known as Western Peripheral Expressway) on Monday Aug 16, 2010 assured the Haryana Government that the project would be completed in June 2011. It also assured that the partial 50-km stretch between Manesar and Palawal would be opened in February 2011. The commitment came in a meeting convened by Haryana Chief Secretary, Urvashi Gulati, in Chandigarh on Monday, in which KMP Expressway officials participated. Gulati asked the company to expedite work on the Expressway and complete it as early as possible. The meeting took place after the Haryana government took notice of a report published in Hindustan Times, in which KMPEL had said that it would not open the 50-km partial stretch in November but the entire 135-km stretch together in the middle of 2011, said a Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (HSIIDC) official. The company was to open the stretch partially in November as per its earlier commitment.
Bhupinder Singh Hooda Reviews Already Delayed KMP Expressway Progress TUESDAY, 21 DECEMBER 2010 22:58 WRITTEN BY SANJEEV SHARMA Chandigarh (ABC Live): After many earlier failed deadlines on Tuesday the DS Construction company responsible to construct Kundli-Manesar-Palwal (KMP) Expressway has once gain set deadline to complete the 53 kms long stretch of the expressway from Manesar to Palwal by March 2011. Information to this effect was issued by Haryana Information and Public Relations department on Tuesday after Haryana Chief Minister, Mr. Bhupinder Singh Hooda had an aerial survey of the Kundli-Manesar-Palwal (KMP) Expressway and reviewed the progress of its construction work near Gurgaon and near Rai. As per released statement the 135 kms long expressway is being constructed on war footing (Defeated in WAR every time) at a cost of about Rs.1830 crore. Press release further says that according to the construction company, the DS Construction, the 53 kms long stretch of the expressway from Manesar to Palwal would be completed by March 2011 and it would be opened to traffic. It would connect National Highway No.8 and National Highway No.2. The stretch between Kundli and Manesar is expected to be completed by August 2011. The Press release quoted the company officers of the construction company that big loops would be constructed on the expressway where it cuts the Delhi-Amritsar National Highway No.1, Delhi-Fazilka National Highway No.10 and Delhi-Jaipur National Highway No.8. These officers also revealed that all clearances including that of railways for construction of ROBs have been obtained and now there would be no laxity in the construction of the expressway. The process of acquisition of land has also been completed and there was no obstruction. Initially, the expressway would be a four-lane road, but there would be provision to wide it for a six-lane road. The expressway is being constructed by DS Construction Company which had been given a time schedule of 23 years and nine months to complete it on BOT basis and recover its cost
Apr 05, 2011: Unhappy with the slow progress of the KMP Expressway, the Haryana government has warned the private concessionaire of invoking action as per terms of the concession agreement. Sources said that it could impose financial penalty on the developer, though it will be meager in comparison to the cost of the project. The state government has asked the concessionaire to give the final date of opening the first stretch between Manesar and Palwal, which was scheduled to be operational by this month-end. The concessionaire submitted that it would give the exact date after accessing the ground situation, said a senior HSIIDC official. These instructions were issued at a meeting chaired by the chief secretary, Urvashi Gulati, to review the progress of the expressway project on Tuesday. Some of the issues put forward by the concessionaire as reasons behind the slow progress were change of scope orders and forest clearance at two to three locations. Gulati said that a sub-committee of the industry secretary and the MD of the HSIIDC might get these issues resolved. The HSIIDC MD, Rajeev Arora, said that concessionaire was trying to shift the focus from non-performance to petty issues.
Miffed at the slow progress of the upcoming Kundli-Manesar-Palwal (KMP) Expressway, the Haryana government has warned concessionaire company KMP Expressways Ltd of slapping the penalty clause. According to the concession agreement, the expressway was to be completed by July 29, 2009, after which the firm would have to pay the government weekly damages at the rate of 0.01 % of the total project cost. Another clause entitles Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (HSIIDC) to terminate the agreement after giving one-month notice to the company if operations do not start within 12 months from the scheduled completion date.
CBI FIR names PWD officials, private firms Hindustan Times, Delhi, May 02, 2011 The Central Bureau of Investigation FIR on alleged irregularities in t he award of the contract for the construction of the Barapullah Elevated Road Project (BERP) — in the run-up to the Commonwealth Games held in October 2010 — has named eight officials of the Public Works Department (PWD) and two private firms. “The FIR named two firms, DS Constructions Limited, the project’s contractor and Tandon Constructions, the project’s consultant,” said a CBI spokesperson. According to an agency source, who is not authorised to speak to the media, the eight PWD officials have been accused of awarding the BERP project — worth R433.71 crore — to construction firms at “an inflated rate”. According to the source, had the project — delayed by around five years — been completed on time, the exchequer could have saved more than R100 crore. The cost of constructing the BER came to around R56,000 per square metre. The PWD, according to the source, had split the project into “two packages”, for early completion of the project. However, it later gave both to the allegedly favoured construction firm by increasing the cost. “It led to a gain of around R50 crore to DS Constructions,” he said. While package one included construction work from Sarai Kale Khan to Mathura Road, package two was for work between Mathura Road and Jawahar Lal Nehru Stadium. “The construction included elevated and slip roads and work related to landscaping, electrification and drainage,” said the source. The CBI had, on Saturday, registered the FIR over alleged irregularities in the Barapullah project. The Central Vigilance Commission had, in 2010, handed over the probe into the alleged irregularities to CBI. According to the source, the construction firm had allegedly not complied with quality control measures, including carrying out lateral load test of piles. He said the accused PWD officials also did not insist on it.
Hindustan Times, Chandigarh, May 03, 2011 KMP Expressway may miss deadline again The monthly progress of the upcoming Kundli-Manesar-Palwal (KMP) Expressway has dropped down during the first three months of this year. At the present pace, it is unlikely that the concessionaire will be able to complete the project by November 2011, the latest deadline committed by it. KMP Expressways Ltd, the concessionaire, has already missed the April 30 deadline for opening traffic on the priority section of Manesar to Palwal. “In light of the dwindling progress it is certain that the concessionaire is not going to keep up to his commitment again,” said a senior official. The monthly progress of the 135.65-km-long expressway went down to 1.06%, 0.88 % and 0.91% during January, February and March respectively. As per the latest bulletin, the concessionaire has achieved a physical progress of 61.32% (R908 crore) till March 31, 2011 against the original commercial operation date (CoD) of July 29, 2011 and revised CoD of December 31, 2010. “The monthly progress of the project had been continuously much below the targets fixed by the concessionaire and in view of the slow progress of the work, secretary, Union Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, who is the chairman of the monitoring committee has expressed dissatisfaction on the project,” said an official, who attended the April 5 review of the project conducted by the High Powered Committee (Expressways). Though the chairman of the Centre’s monitoring committee has asked Haryana to take appropriate action as per the concession agreement, it seems the state government is not too keen on invoking the penal clauses of the agreement. Group chairman of KMP Expressways, HS Kohli, on the other hand, has expressed reservations regarding the proposed penal action as per the minutes of the April 5 meeting.
May 30, 2011 The 135-km Kundli-Manesar-Palwal (KMP) Expressway project, which was to be thrown open to the public in 2009, to ease congested roads in Delhi, continues to linger on till date. Moreover, the Haryana government has extended the partial opening of the 53-km stretch between Manesar and Palwal slated for May 31, 2011, by three more months. Rajiv Arora, managing director, Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (HSIIDC) said, “Besides certain issues related to clearances from the Central government, there were issues like unrest in Libya where KMPEL has many projects. I think that trouble is now over.”
Target Date, by July/ August 2009 (42 Months). The KMP would intersect NH-10, at a distance of merely 4 Kms from Bahadurgarh. This is expected to further shorten the distance to Gurgoan (19 Kms.) and Sonepat (25 Kms,) only. Bahadurgarh to Sonepat 19 Kms Bahadurgarh to Gurgaon 25 Kms
Target Completion date re-sheduled to Jan 2010 (Delay months) This is first extension. Performance/ poject management skill of NAHI, DS Construction and Haryan Ind Development Corp. will be tested
Both WPE (Kundli-Manesar-Palwal) and EPE (Sonepat-Baghpat-Ghaziabad), having a combined length of 269 km, are lagging badly. The deadline for WPE was July 27, 2009 but the monitoring committee on inspection found that only 12.2% of the work had been carried out by contractors till December 31, 2008 as against the target of 73.21%. EPE contract is not awarded yet due to single quote received.
PROJECT PROGRESS KMP EXPRESS Start Date Feb 2006 Target Date 29 07 09 Duration 42 Months Project Cost Rs.1, 800 Crores Revised Target Date Jan 2010 Actual Progress 12.20 % as on 31 12 08 (Planned Scheduled 73.21 %) Actual Progress 14.47 % as on 23 02 09 (Span Consultant Private appointed by HSIDC to monitor the project) Actual Progress 18.03 % as on 30 04 09 (As per Sh. AK Singla of HSIDC) Actual Progress 20.0 % as on May 09 (As per Sh. AK Singla of HSIDC) 1. This project is for National Capital of India 2. Our Supreme Court is monitoring the project progress 3. Project area with good connectivity/ communication network, availability of Infrastructure, raw material and man power 4. Executed by private player on Public Private Partnership basis 5. Toll Road early commissioned early earning per day 6. We have “Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation Government of India ” 7. State CM is monitoring the project We are failed in meeting the target. We shall analysis, Why we are NALAYAK in “Project Implementation and Management”. What will be the status of project implementation in remote / hilly/ rural/ backward/ inaccessible locations sponsored by poor and politically CHOR state governments?
Financial commissioner and principal secretary of industries, (Haryana)Mr Y S Malik said on Nov20, 2009. Malik claimed that the connectivity between NH-8 near Manesar and NH-2 near Palwal would get a push with the opening of the first stretch of the KMP expressway. "The concessionaire has told us that it would be opened for traffic in the next 3-4 months. However, we have extended the deadline of the entire stretch to December 2010,'' he said. The developer had earlier claimed to complete this stretch by this year end.
Feb 05, 2010 PROGRSS REPORT SUBMITTED TO SUPEREME COURT Western Expressway Physical Progress on Nov 30, 2009 32.20 % Vs Planned progress for July 29, 2009 - 100 %. New plan progress will be achieved on Dec 31, 2010 of 52.60 % Delhi’s environmental woes are here to stay with the ambitious Eastern Peripheral Expressway (EPE), planned as an alternate route for heavy commercial vehicles crossing the Capital, all set to miss its October 2010 deadline by four years. The environmental panel under Bhure Lal, monitoring the project work, informed the Forest Bench of the Supreme Court on Friday that while acquisition of land was still incomplete, the project has witnessed an escalation in cost from an estimated Rs 3,551 crore to Rs 4,700 crore, with the road showing no signs of completion before 2014.
The company constructing Kundli-Manesar-Palwal (KMP) Expressway (also known as Western Peripheral Expressway) on Monday Aug 16, 2010 assured the Haryana Government that the project would be completed in June 2011. It also assured that the partial 50-km stretch between Manesar and Palawal would be opened in February 2011. The commitment came in a meeting convened by Haryana Chief Secretary, Urvashi Gulati, in Chandigarh on Monday, in which KMP Expressway officials participated. Gulati asked the company to expedite work on the Expressway and complete it as early as possible. The meeting took place after the Haryana government took notice of a report published in Hindustan Times, in which KMPEL had said that it would not open the 50-km partial stretch in November but the entire 135-km stretch together in the middle of 2011, said a Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (HSIIDC) official. The company was to open the stretch partially in November as per its earlier commitment.
Bhupinder Singh Hooda Reviews Already Delayed KMP Expressway Progress TUESDAY, 21 DECEMBER 2010 22:58 WRITTEN BY SANJEEV SHARMA Chandigarh (ABC Live): After many earlier failed deadlines on Tuesday the DS Construction company responsible to construct Kundli-Manesar-Palwal (KMP) Expressway has once gain set deadline to complete the 53 kms long stretch of the expressway from Manesar to Palwal by March 2011. Information to this effect was issued by Haryana Information and Public Relations department on Tuesday after Haryana Chief Minister, Mr. Bhupinder Singh Hooda had an aerial survey of the Kundli-Manesar-Palwal (KMP) Expressway and reviewed the progress of its construction work near Gurgaon and near Rai. As per released statement the 135 kms long expressway is being constructed on war footing (Defeated in WAR every time) at a cost of about Rs.1830 crore. Press release further says that according to the construction company, the DS Construction, the 53 kms long stretch of the expressway from Manesar to Palwal would be completed by March 2011 and it would be opened to traffic. It would connect National Highway No.8 and National Highway No.2. The stretch between Kundli and Manesar is expected to be completed by August 2011. The Press release quoted the company officers of the construction company that big loops would be constructed on the expressway where it cuts the Delhi-Amritsar National Highway No.1, Delhi-Fazilka National Highway No.10 and Delhi-Jaipur National Highway No.8. These officers also revealed that all clearances including that of railways for construction of ROBs have been obtained and now there would be no laxity in the construction of the expressway. The process of acquisition of land has also been completed and there was no obstruction. Initially, the expressway would be a four-lane road, but there would be provision to wide it for a six-lane road. The expressway is being constructed by DS Construction Company which had been given a time schedule of 23 years and nine months to complete it on BOT basis and recover its cost
Apr 05, 2011: Unhappy with the slow progress of the KMP Expressway, the Haryana government has warned the private concessionaire of invoking action as per terms of the concession agreement. Sources said that it could impose financial penalty on the developer, though it will be meager in comparison to the cost of the project. The state government has asked the concessionaire to give the final date of opening the first stretch between Manesar and Palwal, which was scheduled to be operational by this month-end. The concessionaire submitted that it would give the exact date after accessing the ground situation, said a senior HSIIDC official. These instructions were issued at a meeting chaired by the chief secretary, Urvashi Gulati, to review the progress of the expressway project on Tuesday. Some of the issues put forward by the concessionaire as reasons behind the slow progress were change of scope orders and forest clearance at two to three locations. Gulati said that a sub-committee of the industry secretary and the MD of the HSIIDC might get these issues resolved. The HSIIDC MD, Rajeev Arora, said that concessionaire was trying to shift the focus from non-performance to petty issues.
Miffed at the slow progress of the upcoming Kundli-Manesar-Palwal (KMP) Expressway, the Haryana government has warned concessionaire company KMP Expressways Ltd of slapping the penalty clause. According to the concession agreement, the expressway was to be completed by July 29, 2009, after which the firm would have to pay the government weekly damages at the rate of 0.01 % of the total project cost. Another clause entitles Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (HSIIDC) to terminate the agreement after giving one-month notice to the company if operations do not start within 12 months from the scheduled completion date.
CBI FIR names PWD officials, private firms Hindustan Times, Delhi, May 02, 2011 The Central Bureau of Investigation FIR on alleged irregularities in t he award of the contract for the construction of the Barapullah Elevated Road Project (BERP) — in the run-up to the Commonwealth Games held in October 2010 — has named eight officials of the Public Works Department (PWD) and two private firms. “The FIR named two firms, DS Constructions Limited, the project’s contractor and Tandon Constructions, the project’s consultant,” said a CBI spokesperson. According to an agency source, who is not authorised to speak to the media, the eight PWD officials have been accused of awarding the BERP project — worth R433.71 crore — to construction firms at “an inflated rate”. According to the source, had the project — delayed by around five years — been completed on time, the exchequer could have saved more than R100 crore. The cost of constructing the BER came to around R56,000 per square metre. The PWD, according to the source, had split the project into “two packages”, for early completion of the project. However, it later gave both to the allegedly favoured construction firm by increasing the cost. “It led to a gain of around R50 crore to DS Constructions,” he said. While package one included construction work from Sarai Kale Khan to Mathura Road, package two was for work between Mathura Road and Jawahar Lal Nehru Stadium. “The construction included elevated and slip roads and work related to landscaping, electrification and drainage,” said the source. The CBI had, on Saturday, registered the FIR over alleged irregularities in the Barapullah project. The Central Vigilance Commission had, in 2010, handed over the probe into the alleged irregularities to CBI. According to the source, the construction firm had allegedly not complied with quality control measures, including carrying out lateral load test of piles. He said the accused PWD officials also did not insist on it.
Hindustan Times, Chandigarh, May 03, 2011 KMP Expressway may miss deadline again The monthly progress of the upcoming Kundli-Manesar-Palwal (KMP) Expressway has dropped down during the first three months of this year. At the present pace, it is unlikely that the concessionaire will be able to complete the project by November 2011, the latest deadline committed by it. KMP Expressways Ltd, the concessionaire, has already missed the April 30 deadline for opening traffic on the priority section of Manesar to Palwal. “In light of the dwindling progress it is certain that the concessionaire is not going to keep up to his commitment again,” said a senior official. The monthly progress of the 135.65-km-long expressway went down to 1.06%, 0.88 % and 0.91% during January, February and March respectively. As per the latest bulletin, the concessionaire has achieved a physical progress of 61.32% (R908 crore) till March 31, 2011 against the original commercial operation date (CoD) of July 29, 2011 and revised CoD of December 31, 2010. “The monthly progress of the project had been continuously much below the targets fixed by the concessionaire and in view of the slow progress of the work, secretary, Union Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, who is the chairman of the monitoring committee has expressed dissatisfaction on the project,” said an official, who attended the April 5 review of the project conducted by the High Powered Committee (Expressways). Though the chairman of the Centre’s monitoring committee has asked Haryana to take appropriate action as per the concession agreement, it seems the state government is not too keen on invoking the penal clauses of the agreement. Group chairman of KMP Expressways, HS Kohli, on the other hand, has expressed reservations regarding the proposed penal action as per the minutes of the April 5 meeting.
May 30, 2011 The 135-km Kundli-Manesar-Palwal (KMP) Expressway project, which was to be thrown open to the public in 2009, to ease congested roads in Delhi, continues to linger on till date. Moreover, the Haryana government has extended the partial opening of the 53-km stretch between Manesar and Palwal slated for May 31, 2011, by three more months. Rajiv Arora, managing director, Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (HSIIDC) said, “Besides certain issues related to clearances from the Central government, there were issues like unrest in Libya where KMPEL has many projects. I think that trouble is now over.”
DLF Verdict may open Pandora's box for real estate sector
Verdict may open Pandora's box for real estate sector
The Rs 630-crore penalty imposed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on DLF Ltd may open a Pandora’s Box for the real estate industry, according to analysts.
“There are so many projects where real estate developers have not delivered (as promised),” an industry representative reasoned.
While most developers reported delivery slippages in their recently announced first-quarter results, many of them are learnt to have made changes in building structures or materials used without keeping their customers in the loop.
“The DLF case might become a precedent for other such litigations to follow, which would be a problematic situation for the industry,” said R R Singh, deputy general of the National Real Estate Development Council.
G P Srivastava, senior advisor at the Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India, said there could be more such litigations in the near future. “It could be an eye-opener for other builders,” he said.
However, an industry source argued these practices (violations in realty projects) were rampant in India. “This (the CCI penalty on DLF) should be an example that customers should not be taken for a ride,” he said. “At least, someone has finally acted on these practices.”
Kaustuv Roy, executive director of Cushman & Wakefield India, said the CCI directive due to delay in construction could be viewed as a strict warning for developers who had not been factoring contingencies in mind while launching projects. It’s also a move to establish that the rights of the purchaser would be protected in case of an indefinite delay. However, he said since construction was a long-term process and dependent on external factors like economic environment, legal and governance issues and legislative amendments, “many of these factors cannot be entirely pre-empted at the start of a project”.
The Rs 630-crore penalty imposed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on DLF Ltd may open a Pandora’s Box for the real estate industry, according to analysts.
“There are so many projects where real estate developers have not delivered (as promised),” an industry representative reasoned.
While most developers reported delivery slippages in their recently announced first-quarter results, many of them are learnt to have made changes in building structures or materials used without keeping their customers in the loop.
“The DLF case might become a precedent for other such litigations to follow, which would be a problematic situation for the industry,” said R R Singh, deputy general of the National Real Estate Development Council.
G P Srivastava, senior advisor at the Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India, said there could be more such litigations in the near future. “It could be an eye-opener for other builders,” he said.
However, an industry source argued these practices (violations in realty projects) were rampant in India. “This (the CCI penalty on DLF) should be an example that customers should not be taken for a ride,” he said. “At least, someone has finally acted on these practices.”
Kaustuv Roy, executive director of Cushman & Wakefield India, said the CCI directive due to delay in construction could be viewed as a strict warning for developers who had not been factoring contingencies in mind while launching projects. It’s also a move to establish that the rights of the purchaser would be protected in case of an indefinite delay. However, he said since construction was a long-term process and dependent on external factors like economic environment, legal and governance issues and legislative amendments, “many of these factors cannot be entirely pre-empted at the start of a project”.
Friday, January 15, 2010
Friends of Bahadugarh
This Blog is for Group of people, who Love Bahadurgarh
All are welcome those can contribute for our joint objectives.
Objective of Blog
1. Share Information regarding Development & Progress of Bahadurgarh
2. Project real image to Outsiders
3. Inter act with Govt Authorities & Industrial/ Business Houses to Improve the Civics Facilities
4. Improve the Quality of Living
5. Attract Employment & Educational Opportunities
6. Make Bahadurgarh Cosmopolitan
7. Develop at par with Gurgaon & Noida
8. Make City Clean & Green
9. Raise the Problems of Water/ Electricity/ Connectivity/ Law & Order
10. Become Bahadurgarh Ki Awaaz
REQUEST
Write your contact detail in comments (You need G Mail Account for Writing Comments)
Write your feedback / suggestion / grievance / complaint / sufferer as a comments
All are requested to write comments on the Blog, so that it shall work as our Public Notice Board and increase participation among members
S. K. Malik (Coordinator)
098186 86240 (M) 011 2507 5158(Res)
E Mail skmlk@yahoo.co.in
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
